LogiPundit

Just another WordPress.com weblog

Archive for the ‘Racial Preferences’ Category

Law School Racial Preferences Recipient Justice Clarence Thomas Says Yale Law Degree Worth 15 Cents

Posted by wdporter on October 22, 2007

Justice Says Law Degree Worth 15 Cents
Sunday, October 21, 2007 12:25 PM
NEW HAVEN, Conn. — U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas has a 15-cent price tag stuck to his Yale law degree, blaming the school’s affirmative action policies in the 1970s for his difficulty finding a job after he graduated.
Some of his black classmates say Thomas needs to get over his grudge because Yale opened the door to extraordinary opportunities.
Thomas’ new autobiography, “My Grandfather’s Son,” shows how the second black justice on the Supreme Court came to oppose affirmative action after his law school experience. He was one of about 10 blacks in a class of 160 who had arrived at Yale after the unrest of the 1960s, which culminated in a Black Panther Party trial in New Haven that nearly caused a large-scale riot.
The conservative justice says he initially considered his admission to Yale a dream, but soon felt he was there because of his race. He says he loaded up on tough courses to prove he was not inferior to his white classmates but considers the effort futile. He says he was repeatedly turned down in job interviews at law firms after his 1974 graduation.
“I learned the hard way that a law degree from Yale meant one thing for white graduates and another for blacks, no matter how much any one denied it,” Thomas writes. “I’d graduated from one of America’s top law schools, but racial preference had robbed my achievement of its true value.”
Thomas says he stores his Yale Law degree in his basement with a 15-cent sticker from a cigar package on the frame.
His view isn’t shared by black classmate William Coleman III.
“I can only say my degree from Yale Law School has been a great boon,” said Coleman, now an attorney in Philadelphia. “Had he not gone to a school like Yale, he would not be sitting on the Supreme Court.”
Coleman’s Yale roommate, Bill Clinton, appointed him general counsel to the U.S. Army, one of several top jobs Coleman has held over the years.
Thomas said he began interviewing with law firms at the beginning of his third year of law school.
“Many asked pointed questions unsubtly suggesting that they doubted I was as smart as my grades indicated,” he wrote. “Now I knew what a law degree from Yale was worth when it bore the taint of racial preference.”
He said it was months before he got an offer, from then-Missouri Attorney General John Danforth.
Steven Duke, a white Yale law professor who taught when Thomas attended Yale, said Thomas is right to say that the significance of someone’s degree could be called into question if the person was admitted to an institution on a preferential basis. However, he said that could be overcome by strong performance, noting that two Yale graduates _ Danforth and President Bush _ put Thomas into top jobs.
“I find it difficult to believe he actually regrets the choice he made,” Duke said. “It seems to me he did pretty well.”
Some classmates say Thomas _ who was raised poor in Georgia and stood out on campus in his overalls and heavy black boots _ faced a tougher transition than black students who came from middle-class or privileged backgrounds.
Frank Washington, a black classmate and friend of Thomas who also came from a lower-income background, said he had 42 interviews before he landed a job at a Washington law firm.
“It seemed like I had to go through many more interviews than a lot of my other non-minority classmates,” said Washington, now an entrepreneur who owns radio and television stations.
Other black classmates say their backgrounds didn’t matter.
Edgar Taplin Jr., raised by a single parent in New Orleans, said he landed a job after graduation at the oldest law firm in New York, and does not recall black graduates struggling more to get jobs than their white classmates.
“My degree was worth a lot more than 15 cents,” said Taplin, who retired in 2003 as a global manager with Exxon Mobil.
Thomas has declined to have his portrait hung at Yale Law School along with other graduates who became U.S. Supreme Court justices. An earlier book, “Supreme Discomfort,” by Washington Post reporters Kevin Merida and Michael Fletcher, portrays Thomas as still upset some Yale professors opposed his confirmation during hearings marked by Anita Hill’s allegations that Thomas sexually harassed her.
Yale Law School Dean Harold Koh turned down requests for interviews about the justice’s book, but said in a statement that he and his predecessors have invited Thomas to have his portrait done and the offer still stands.
Koh said they met for several hours about a year ago. “He made it clear that he had greatly enjoyed his time at Yale Law School, and that he had great affection for his fellow students and for several professors who are still here,” he said.
Thomas would not comment, said court spokeswoman Kathy Arberg.
William Coleman says it’s time for Thomas to move on.
“You did OK, guy,” he said.

Posted in Justice Clarence Thomas, Law School, Race in America, Racial Preferences, Supreme Court, Yale | Leave a Comment »

State Bar of California and Civil Rights Group Spar Over Racial Preferences for Blacks in Law School Admissions

Posted by wdporter on October 16, 2007

State Bar of California, Civil Rights Group Spar Over Affirmative Action
Tuesday , October 16, 2007
By William LaJeunesse
Does affirmative action work? An explosive study that suggests it does not is pitting the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights against the State Bar of California in a battle over admissions data that could determine once and for all if racial preferences help or hurt minority students.
“Currently only about one in three African-Americans who goes to an American law school passes the bar on the first attempt and a majority never become lawyers at all,” says UCLA law professor Richard Sander.
In an article published in the Stanford Law Review, Sander and his research team concluded several thousand would-be black lawyers either dropped out of law school or failed to pass the bar because of affirmative action.
Known as the ‘mismatch’ effect, Sander claims students who are unprepared and whose academic credentials are below the median are admitted to law schools they are unqualified to attend. If those same students instead were to go to less elite or competitive schools, more would graduate, pass the bar and become lawyers.
“This is a serious issue and we need to see more research in the area of mismatch,” argues Gail Heriot, a professor of law at the University of San Diego and a member of the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. “What we need now is more cooperation from the California Bar” Association.
Recently, a California bar committee voted 5-3 to turn down Sander’s request to use bar data collected over the last three decades on student test scores, law school admissions, academic performance and bar passage rates.
The data, considered a gold standard by affirmative action researchers, is considered key to determine if racial preferences work.
“There is no answer but to give him the information,” says black civil rights attorney Leo Terrell. “What is the state bar afraid of? We need to know.”
But the Bar refuses to give Sander the data.
“The release (bar exam) applicants sign does not allow us to release the information to third parties,” Whitnie Henderson told FOX News. “Looking at all the information we just decided it was not something that fit within the committee’s purview.”
Henderson headed the committee that rejected Sander’s request. Contrary to her statement, twice in the last 15 years the California Bar released individual information to outside researchers.
Law Professor Vikram Amar at UC Davis believes the Bar rejected Sander’s request because the study is “controversial,” examining the huge disparities in bar passage among different racial groups attending the same law school.
Law schools do not disclose attrition, graduation and bar passage rates to minorities admitted through preferences and have opposed pressure to do so. About 62 percent of today’s top black lawyers attended the most elite U.S. law schools, according to Law Professor Richard Lempert at the University of Michigan.
Unlike Sander, Lempert believes the number of black lawyers would decrease if affirmative action ended. He says race, ethnicity and LSAT scores do not predict future income or satisfaction.
The Board of Governors of the California Bar may reconsider Sander’s request during its November meeting, but for now no one can say whether affirmative action actually does what’s intended.

Posted in California, Law School, Race Baiter, Race in America, Racial Preferences, Statistics, Universities | Leave a Comment »

White Man Awarded $150,000 in Racism Lawsuit

Posted by wdporter on August 24, 2007

White Man Awarded $150,000 in Racism Lawsuit
Thursday, August 23, 2007
BUFFALO, N.Y. — A federal jury awarded a white man $150,000 in a racial discrimination lawsuit Wednesday.
Mark Pasternak, who is white, said he was dismissed from his state job helping troubled youths because he could not tolerate being called names like “cracker,” “polack” and “stupid white boy.”
A seven-member all-white jury found that Tommy Baines, who is black, discriminated against Pasternak and created a hostile work environment.
“I’m elated and overwhelmed,” Pasternak told The Buffalo News Wednesday. “I feel like I’ve been to hell and back … After all these years, the best feeling is, the jury heard his story and mine, and they believed me.”
Pasternak’s attorney, David Seeger, said his client took abuse from Baines for three years while the two men worked with an agency formerly known as the state Division for Youth. The facility is no longer in operation.
Baines subjected Pasternak to race-based slurs, job sabotage and crude insults in front of co-workers, according to court papers and testimony.
Baines and his attorney, William Hites, did not return calls seeking comment.
According to court records, the state investigated the racial allegations in 1998. Baines was fined $2,000 for his conduct, but he was allowed to continue working as a supervisor.
Pasternak claimed he experienced to insomnia, anxiety and depression and had to take several medical leaves of absence because of the verbal abuse.
He was dismissed by the state in 1999. The state later offered Pasternak his job, but he said he turned it down because the state refused to guarantee he wouldn’t be working under Baines again.
Brian Marchetti, a spokesman for the state office, had no immediate comment Wednesday.
“When I was growing up, I was always taught to stay away from racial slurs … and epitaphs,” Pasternak said. “This kind of conduct, from a supervisor who worked with kids, really bothered me.”

Posted in Notable Trials, Race in America, Racial Preferences | Leave a Comment »

Walter Williams – A call for black vigilantism

Posted by wdporter on August 22, 2007

A call for black vigilantism

Walter E. Williams
Posted: August 22, 20071:00 a.m. Eastern

World Net Daily
Last year, among the nation’s 10 largest cities, Philadelphia had the highest murder rate with 406 victims. This year could easily top last year’s with 240 murders so far.
Other cities such as Baltimore, Detroit and Washington, D.C., with large black populations, experience the nation’s highest rates of murder and violent crime. This high murder rate is, and has been, predominantly a black problem.
According to Bureau of Justice statistics, between 1976 and 2005, blacks, while 13 percent of the population, committed over 52 percent of the nation’s homicides and were 46 percent of the homicide victims. Ninety-four percent of black homicide victims had a black person as their murderer.
Blacks are not only the major victims of homicide; blacks suffer high rates of all categories of serious violent crime, and another black is most often the perpetrator.
Liberals and their political allies say the problem is the easy accessibility of guns and greater gun control is the solution. That has to be nonsense. Guns do not commit crimes; people do.
Up through 1979, the FBI reported homicide arrests sorted by racial breakdowns that included Japanese. Between 1976 and 1978, 21 of 48,695 arrests for murder and non-negligent manslaughter were Japanese-Americans. That translates to an annual murder rate of 1 per 100,000 of the Japanese-American population. Would anyone advance the argument that the reason why homicide is virtually nonexistent among Japanese-Americans is because they can’t find guns?
The high victimization rate experienced by the overwhelmingly law-abiding black community is mostly the result of predators not having to pay a heavy enough price for their behavior. They benefit from all kinds of asinine excuses, such as poverty, racial discrimination and few employment opportunities.
During the 1940s and ’50s, I grew up in North Philadelphia where many of today’s murders occur. It was a time when blacks were much poorer, there was far more racial discrimination, and fewer employment opportunities and other opportunities for upward socioeconomic mobility were available. There was nowhere near the level of crime and wanton destruction that exists today. Behavior accepted today wasn’t accepted then by either black adults or policemen.
Police authorities often know who are the local criminals and drug lords and where crack houses are located; however, various legal technicalities hamper their ability to make arrests and raids. Law-abiding citizens are often afraid to assist police or testify against criminals for fear of retaliation that can include murder. The level of criminal activity not only puts residents in physical jeopardy but also represents a heavy tax on people least able to bear it. That heavy tax includes higher prices for goods and services and fewer shopping opportunities because supermarkets and other large retailers are reluctant to bear the costs of doing business in high-crime areas.
So here’s the question: Should black people accept government’s dereliction of its first basic function, that of providing protection? My answer is no. One of our basic rights is the right to defend oneself against predators. If the government can’t or won’t protect people, people have a right to protect themselves.
You say, “Hey, Williams, you’re not talking about vigilantism, are you?” Yes, I am. Webster’s Dictionary defines vigilantism as: a volunteer committee organized to suppress and punish crime summarily as when the processes of law are viewed as inadequate.
Example: A number of years ago, black Muslims began to patrol Mayfair, a drug-infested, gang-ridden Washington, D.C., housing project. The gangs and drug lords left, probably because the black Muslims didn’t feel obliged to issue Miranda warnings. Black men should set up neighborhood patrols, armed if necessary, and if politicians and police don’t like it, they should do their jobs. No one should have to live in daily fear for their lives and safety.

Posted in Democrat / Liberal / Communists, Race Baiter, Race in America, Racial Preferences, Statistics | Leave a Comment »

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY… All the Lies Fit to Print in the Name of Racial Preference

Posted by wdporter on July 31, 2007

ON THIS DAY IN HISTORY… All the lies fit to print
July 31, 2003: A report examining problems at the New York Times blasted the newspaper for a lack of communication, but downplayed the push for racial diversity as a leading factor in its Jayson Blair plagiarism scandal.
The 94-page report said it’s “simplistic” to believe promotion of minority reporters like Blair was the essential cause of the calamity.
“The fraud Jayson Blair committed on us and our readers was not a consequence of our diversity program, which has been designed to apply the same rigorous standards of performance we demand of all our staff,” Bill Keller wrote on his first official day as executive editor.
“The problem is, in the Blair case, we failed to measure up to those standards at numerous steps along the way.”

Posted in Liberal / Communists, Liberal Media, Racial Preferences | Leave a Comment »

It Is Now Time to Bury Brown v. Board of Education

Posted by wdporter on June 29, 2007

Don’t Mourn Brown v. Board of Education
By JUAN WILLIAMS Published: June 29, 2007 Washington

LET us now praise the Brown decision. Let us now bury the Brown decision.With yesterday’s Supreme Court ruling ending the use of voluntary schemes to create racial balance among students, it is time to acknowledge that Brown’s time has passed. It is worthy of a send-off with fanfare for setting off the civil rights movement and inspiring social progress for women, gays and the poor. But the decision in Brown v. Board of Education that focused on outlawing segregated schools as unconstitutional is now out of step with American political and social realities.Desegregation does not speak to dropout rates that hover near 50 percent for black and Hispanic high school students. It does not equip society to address the so-called achievement gap between black and white students that mocks Brown’s promise of equal educational opportunity.And the fact is, during the last 20 years, with Brown in full force, America’s public schools have been growing more segregated — even as the nation has become more racially diverse. In 2001, the National Center for Education Statistics reported that the average white student attends a school that is 80 percent white, while 70 percent of black students attend schools where nearly two-thirds of students are black and Hispanic….
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/opinion/29williams.html

Posted in National Association for the Advancement of Liberal Col, Public Education, Racial Preferences, Supreme Court | Leave a Comment »